Comments for while true blog http://blog.whiletrue.com Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:48:05 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Out source software developers http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1714 Out source software developers Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:48:05 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1714 Thanks for giving me other metrics as i have only idea of database caching . Thanks for giving me other metrics as i have only idea of database caching .

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by hhrvoje http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1692 hhrvoje Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:54:47 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1692 Odličan test, baš ono šta je trebalo još od izdavanja prve preview verzije. Odličan test, baš ono šta je trebalo još od izdavanja prve preview verzije.

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Jesús López http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1683 Jesús López Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:43:23 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1683 I have realized that declarative partial views are much faster than RenderPartial. Just register your partial view: And use it the old way: <% for (int i = 0; i I have realized that declarative partial views are much faster than RenderPartial. Just register your partial view:

And use it the old way:

<% for (int i = 0; i

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Sruly Taber http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1679 Sruly Taber Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:07:56 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1679 Thanks. I found this very valuable Thanks.

I found this very valuable

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Link Roundup :: eric.ness.net http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1674 Link Roundup :: eric.ness.net Thu, 28 May 2009 02:51:46 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1674 [...] ASP.NET MVC Performance [...] [...] ASP.NET MVC Performance [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Strong typing views in ASP.NET MVC - External - CodeSmith Community http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1643 Strong typing views in ASP.NET MVC - External - CodeSmith Community Mon, 11 May 2009 20:53:10 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1643 [...] the view using various file-system locations and thus loosing valuable time. Lesson learned from Whiletrue's ASP.NET MVC presentation at [...] [...] the view using various file-system locations and thus loosing valuable time. Lesson learned from Whiletrue's ASP.NET MVC presentation at [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Jessicatona http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1640 Jessicatona Sun, 10 May 2009 17:10:44 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1640 That was nice. Thank you for sharing this one. That was nice. Thank you for sharing this one.

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by ilker Aksu http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1638 ilker Aksu Sat, 09 May 2009 07:22:15 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1638 Tank you posting this great presentation. It made me think a lot on my MVC application. Tank you posting this great presentation.
It made me think a lot on my MVC application.

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Introducing ABAnalyzer, an Apache Bench runner and analyzer - moleskine di un programmatore http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1624 Introducing ABAnalyzer, an Apache Bench runner and analyzer - moleskine di un programmatore Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:47:50 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1624 [...] I've read a lot of blog post about Asp.Net MVC Performance. Following the Simone’s post and Rudi’s post i started to test the Asp.Net MVC engine. First of all i wanted to test using the same Apache [...] [...] I've read a lot of blog post about Asp.Net MVC Performance. Following the Simone’s post and Rudi’s post i started to test the Asp.Net MVC engine. First of all i wanted to test using the same Apache [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Simone http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1622 Simone Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:04:23 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1622 Thank you for correcting the slides and putting the errata on the post. I just checked the old source code of ASP.NET MVC: the beta version didn't have that caching in place, so probably it has been introduced with RC1 in mid-January. Thank you for correcting the slides and putting the errata on the post.

I just checked the old source code of ASP.NET MVC: the beta version didn’t have that caching in place, so probably it has been introduced with RC1 in mid-January.

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by rudi http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1621 rudi Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:04:44 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1621 > Are you sure you did not run your tests in debug mode? Uh, I actually did have it on. I had way too many copies of the project while testing this, the debug mode slipped thru. I've checked the performance impact of this change on DUGG - it indeed makes making full paths to partials a moot point. But on the other end, with the fully optimized version, it doesn't make a difference at all. I remember testing this switch half a year or more ago, with ASP.NET MVC CTP, it didn't make a difference at all for our production (MagCloud) website. Any idea when this caching functionality was added to MVC? Anyways, this requires an errata on the slides and a note about the debug switch and its effect on this path resolving. Coming later this week. > Are you sure you did not run your tests in debug mode?

Uh, I actually did have it on. I had way too many copies of the project while testing this, the debug mode slipped thru.

I’ve checked the performance impact of this change on DUGG – it indeed makes making full paths to partials a moot point. But on the other end, with the fully optimized version, it doesn’t make a difference at all.

I remember testing this switch half a year or more ago, with ASP.NET MVC CTP, it didn’t make a difference at all for our production (MagCloud) website. Any idea when this caching functionality was added to MVC?

Anyways, this requires an errata on the slides and a note about the debug switch and its effect on this path resolving. Coming later this week.

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Simone http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1620 Simone Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:32:06 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1620 Are you sure you did not run your tests in debug mode? Are you sure you did not run your tests in debug mode?

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Righthand's blog - Strong typing routes in ASP.NET MVC http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1618 Righthand's blog - Strong typing routes in ASP.NET MVC Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:03:50 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1618 [...] So, all it took me was a couple of advices from Mark Miller (who is an incredibly helpful person btw) on where to start with parser and a bunch of basic operations of building a DXCore plugin. All in all it took me around 4 hours of my time. Thanks to my friend Miha for method naming suggestion. If it wasn’t for him the method names would be a lot worse. And thanks also to Whiletrue guys for their asp.net mvc performance presentation. [...] [...] So, all it took me was a couple of advices from Mark Miller (who is an incredibly helpful person btw) on where to start with parser and a bunch of basic operations of building a DXCore plugin. All in all it took me around 4 hours of my time. Thanks to my friend Miha for method naming suggestion. If it wasn’t for him the method names would be a lot worse. And thanks also to Whiletrue guys for their asp.net mvc performance presentation. [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by ASP.NET MVC Links :: eric.ness.net http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1612 ASP.NET MVC Links :: eric.ness.net Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:13:17 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1612 [...] ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 1) ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 2) jQuery Search box and Asp.net MVC DataAnnotations and ASP.NET MVC ASP.NET MVC Performance [...] [...] ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 1) ASP.NET MVC Best Practices (Part 2) jQuery Search box and Asp.net MVC DataAnnotations and ASP.NET MVC ASP.NET MVC Performance [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Righthand's blog - Strong typing views in ASP.NET MVC http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1611 Righthand's blog - Strong typing views in ASP.NET MVC Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:01:25 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1611 [...] the view using various file-system locations and thus loosing valuable time. Lesson learned from Whiletrue's ASP.NET MVC presentation at [...] [...] the view using various file-system locations and thus loosing valuable time. Lesson learned from Whiletrue’s ASP.NET MVC presentation at [...]

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Petar Repac http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1608 Petar Repac Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:32:14 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1608 Gorazd and Rudi, congrats to both for an very interesting and useful presentation. Regards, Petar Gorazd and Rudi, congrats to both for an very interesting and useful presentation.

Regards, Petar

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Andrea Balducci http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1607 Andrea Balducci Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:17:00 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1607 Well done Rudi. Any plan to publish the demo code? I would play with the demo app adding client-side rendering and test few other ideas. Great work! Well done Rudi. Any plan to publish the demo code? I would play with the demo app adding client-side rendering and test few other ideas.
Great work!

]]> Comment on ASP.NET MVC Performance by Simone http://blog.whiletrue.com/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1605 Simone Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:16:27 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=61#comment-1605 Nice breakdown of the performance implementations... as it was pretty obvious, the biggest gain comes from caching the data tier. Nice breakdown of the performance implementations…
as it was pretty obvious, the biggest gain comes from caching the data tier.

]]> Comment on Simple programming language performance benchmark(C# vs. Java vs. C++ vs. Ruby) by Simon B. http://blog.whiletrue.com/2006/05/simple-programming-language-performance-benchmarkc-vs-java-vs-c-vs-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-352 Simon B. Thu, 15 May 2008 03:56:07 +0000 http://blog.whiletrue.com/?p=6#comment-352 Why not make two bechmarks, one for compiled languages and one for interpreted ones? Why not make two bechmarks, one for compiled languages and one for interpreted ones?

]]>